పుట:Vedhamu Venkataraya Shastrula Vari Jeevitha Charitra Sangrahamu.pdf/146

వికీసోర్స్ నుండి
ఈ పుట ఆమోదించబడ్డది

me a long way though you differed with me on some points. though there may be difference of opinion on the practical solution of prose diction it would be impossible for us to differ on questions of authority. We go to the same original sourcess; That is Why I admire you. you generally exhaust any subect Which you discuss. But I cannot say the same thing of pandits generally. Judgments are, in their case, a matter purely of sentiment, and they do not take the trouble to examine the genuine Sanskrit tradition. I Was amused to read in దేశమాత (.............'s paper) a sentence whose meaaning I put into english.

"One or two persons advocated the use of గ్రామ్య in dramas, but pandits have condemned the practice" Where are the pandits ? I should like to see them. Of the persons who assembled at pachayappa's I wonder how many deserve that name.

It appears you spoke at the Nidadavolu conference. I am anxious to learn what you said, at leaast your chief arguments and general conclusions. Unfortunately your speeches are not reported in the Madras papers. Only ఆంధ్రప్రకాశిక gave a report of the meeting at which you spoke of Sandhi. The one or two sentences in which your views were given, were written in a Telugu which I did not understand. I shall feel obliged if you publish your Nidadavolu speech in some Telugu weekly - at leaast the gist of it. I value your opinions hihgly. sir, please take some trouble