మొు ద టి ప్ర, కర ణ ము XLX认 రామబ్రహ్రముయొక్క- యింటివిూcద రాళ్లు వేయుటను לs8פר( ప్రోత్సాహ పతిచెనన్న యాతని నవకమును తెలిపె ననియు, ఆ వాక్యము 경 సందర్భమున నవి చేయఁబడినవో యా సంగతులలో విశేషాధికార విశిష్టము లనియు, ఈ సారాంశములో నేను నిర్ణయించుచున్నాను. 14. According to both sides, stone-pelting had been going on at intervals for some months up to August 1889, on Ramabrahmam's house ; and from the evidence of plaintiff himself as well as that of defendant and the defendant's 3rd, 4th, 5th and 17th witnesses it is clear that Ramabrahmam and his sister-in-law Sankaramma who was the senior lady of the house, had repeatedly complained that the stones were being thrown by their son-in-law, a boy in whom plaintiff admittedly took a special interest, and who, at the time with which this issue is concerned, was living separately in a choultry under arrangements admittedly made for him by the plaintiff, having left his wife's (Ramabrahmam's) house because of disputes with Ramabrahmam and Sankaramma in the course of which, as plaintiff himself acknowledges, the boy had wanted his wife to be sent to live separately with him. Ramabrahmam is dead and Sankaramma has not been examined ; but there is the testimony of the foregoing defence witnesses which sufficiently shows that Sankaramma had been going about making no secret of her suspicions that plaintiff was instigating the boy to pelt stones on their house because they had refused to send the boy's wife away to live separately with him, the suggestions being that plaintiff had an improper object in endeavouring to get the girl sent to live elsewhere with this boy, who was under his protection and influence. From the evidence of those witnesses and defendant's 1st and 2nd witnesses it is also plain that it was only after nothing had come of all her previous complaints and after defendant had once declined to interfere in the matter and had referred her to the authorities, that defendant was moved by Sankaramma's appeals on the 28th July 1889 to assist her by his enquiries. - *
